Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F243730A for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41220 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2011 00:19:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 41196 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2011 00:19:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 41188 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2011 00:19:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of slewis@fusesource.com designates 74.125.245.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.245.76] (HELO na3sys010aog104.obsmtp.com) (74.125.245.76) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:31 +0000 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob104.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:10 PDT Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so874757bke.20 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.85.134 with SMTP id o6mr2159849fal.8.1318465148367; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com (mail-bw0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm6569915fab.4.2011.10.12.17.19.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bkas6 with SMTP id s6so863747bka.2 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.157.131 with SMTP id b3mr773028bkx.41.1318465141273; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:19:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: slewis@fusesource.com Received: by 10.204.152.132 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stan Lewis Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:18:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Latest on planned AMQP support To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yep! Encoding/decoding is in good shape, as is the connection and session layers, however the link layer needs to be implemented still since a rash of spec changes kinda made me do a reboot of the implementation back in May/June. That also means the bit that glues it to the Apollo broker will probably need to be updated also. Now that 1.0 has been voted as final it should be easier to implement, note though that they still have yet to put out a final broker spec, the final 1.0 AMQP spec just covers the protocol. Thanks, Stan On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Hiram Chirino wr= ote: > Hi John > > I know that the fusesource guys started working on an AMQP 1.0 > implementation over on github [1] which builds on top of the Apollo > infrastructure. =C2=A0Not sure how complete it is yet. =C2=A0Perhaps Stan= Lewis > can comment on how complete it is. > > [1] https://github.com/fusesource/fabric/tree/master/fabric-apollo/fabric= -apollo-amqp > > > Regards, > Hiram > > FuseSource > Web: http://fusesource.com/ > > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:53 AM, John Fletcher wrote= : >> Hi, I'm looking into AMQP support on ActiveMQ and I've stumbled upon som= e >> mixed signals. >> >> This page claims that ActiveMQ supports AMQP: >> http://activemq.apache.org/cross-language-clients.html, however clicking= on >> the link brings one to a page that states that ActiveMQ does not >> actually support AMQP. The page refers to an upcoming 0.10 release of AM= QP >> (obviously a bit dated) and the desire to integrate into the final versi= on >> of AMQP, which since then has been released. >> >> A bit of searching brought me to fairly old mailing list >> archiveswhere Rob Davies >> stated that rewrite of the ActiveMQ broker would be >> required to support AMQP, and that it is planned for ActiveMQ 6. >> Interestingly there is another evidently dated page about the 6 release = - >> http://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html - which refers to a l= ate >> 2010 release date. >> >> Then there's the Apollo project which *is* in fact a rewrite of ActiveMQ= , >> making me wonder whether AMQP support will be an aim there. >> Can anyone give an update on planned AMQP support in ActiveMQ? Namely is= it >> still envisioned for ActiveMQ 6? If so, does anyone have any idea when s= ome >> kind of ActiveMQ 6 build with AMQP support might surface? Likewise is AM= QP >> support envisioned for Apollo and if so when might a compatible build be >> likely to surface? >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >