Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of suonayi2006@163.com designates
 220.181.13.26 as permitted sender)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:13:57 +0800 (CST)
From: SuoNayi  <suonayi2006@163.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <67c2fcb1.18a82.1332064ce1e.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com>
In-Reply-To: <D52E7C8C-A84A-494D-B295-7C172158D40D@fusesource.com>
References: <D52E7C8C-A84A-494D-B295-7C172158D40D@fusesource.com>
 <2d7326a6.196fc.133203ed818.Coremail.jswqne@163.com>
Subject: Reply:Re: Why does consumer has a lower performance comparing with
 producer?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_323344_652200269.1319098437150"

------=_Part_323344_652200269.1319098437150
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

With the performance of consumer, one of the important factors is which message cursor you have chosen to apply, for better performance ,vmcursor  is suggested.

At 2011-10-20 15:42:28,"Torsten Mielke" <torsten@fusesource.com> wrote:
>Are these persistent messages? 
>
>From my own performance tests I know that enqueuing a persistent message takes longer than dequeuing it, which is the opposite behavior from what you're seeing. Persistent msgs need to be persisted to the brokers store. 
>
>Do you encounter the same behavior when turning off compression?
>Are producer/broker/consumer on the same machine?
>Also, I presume there are no transactions used?
>
>
>
>Torsten Mielke
>torsten@fusesource.com
>tmielke@blogspot.com
>
>On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:32 AM, lzr wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> In my cases, I produces and consumes messages with big data: 40K per message, 10000 messages produced and consumed for each exchange. For better performance I used jms.useCompression in my connection and it did work well:
>> 10000 messages sent in 5 seconds;
>> But my consumer takes about 70 seconds to receive these messages from queue (Just received, no process to message).
>> How is the consumer so lower than producer? Is there any optimization to the consumer?
>> 
>> 
>> It's much appreciated if any suggestions!
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Zhuran Li
>
>
>
>
>

------=_Part_323344_652200269.1319098437150--