Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5A97D80 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58518 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2011 13:20:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 58457 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2011 13:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 58449 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2011 13:20:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:20:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of chris.d.williams@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:19:56 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RIKRE-00039m-3v for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:19:36 -0700 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: cdwillie76 To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1319462376095-3933082.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Problem with policyEntry from 5.3.0 -> 5.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have a set of policies that we used for our 5.3.0 configuration and when we tried to use it with 5.5.0, ActiveMQ won't start. I turned up the logging and didn't see anything to indicate what was wrong. Should this combination of policies work? Thanks Chris -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-policyEntry-from-5-3-0-5-5-0-tp3933082p3933082.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.