activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Known issue with gcInactiveDestinations?
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:51:18 GMT
Martin,

Were your messages flagged as persistent? I ask as it may rule out
persistent storage as being involved.

Jira issue opened in case someone can add something useful to it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3540

James

On 13 October 2011 07:18, Martin C. <martinc@gmx.at> wrote:

> I reported a similar issue back in January
> (
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Bug-quot-Deleting-inactive-destination-quot-with-pending-messages-td3229098.html
> ).
> Unfortunately I never got an answer. It seems to me there might be a
> bug. I never raised a Jira issue, though. We just stopped using the
> gcInactiveDestinations feature, but of course this is not a real
> solution.
>
> I don't think that it is related to STOMP, because we have only been
> using OpenWire, via the Java and C++ libraries.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, James Green <james.mk.green@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In 5.5.0 with gcInactiveDestinations=true, we've been sending messages
> via
> > STOMP with a receipt (proven in the stomp.log).
> >
> > Just occassionally, the message appears to go missing, as does the queue
> > itself. The message is set to persist and has an expiry of several days.
> >
> > Is this an issue that's known about or are we chasing something of our
> own
> > making?
> >
> > James
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message