Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 472A09A8D for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10607 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2011 10:05:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 10583 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2011 10:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 10573 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2011 10:05:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.35.219.98] (HELO gwstu.uhi.ac.uk) (194.35.219.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:05:44 +0000 Received: from sgarbh.smo.uhi.ac.uk ([194.35.194.47]) by gwstu.uhi.ac.uk with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:04:57 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Random persistent messages lost From: Alistair Young In-Reply-To: <3594DF15-CA52-4A2D-9467-E88E82BFD560@uhi.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:04:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <93139781-4FDA-4E23-A8C5-BC71CCEB0745@fusesource.com> <4AA5AAA3-6442-426B-85F8-F45B5AF2D8DB@uhi.ac.uk> <3D2048DE-C0D3-4940-B1BF-FBE3EB0FF970@fusesource.com> <3594DF15-CA52-4A2D-9467-E88E82BFD560@uhi.ac.uk> To: users@activemq.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I should say, the messages go to a topic on the broker and are then = routed by camel to another topc. Would camel be dropping the messages? = Would they not be logged in the kahadb store no matter what though? Alistair --=20 mov eax,1 mov ebx,0 int 80h On 21 Sep 2011, at 10:25, Alistair Young wrote: > I doubt it. In a batch of three messages sent in 2 seconds, one = disappeard. Is there a default throttle limit perhaps on the broker? But = surely that would cause the producer to error out or something? >=20 > ------------------------------------ > Alistair Young > =C0rd-Innleadair air Bathar-Bog > UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 21 Sep 2011, at 09:59, Torsten Mielke wrote: >=20 >> Any chance you can reproduce this behavior in a little JUnit test = case? >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Alistair Young wrote: >>=20 >>>> There was no producer, broker or connection crash while the msg was = in transit? >>> no, the logs show it was up and sending >>>=20 >>>> The msg does not have an expiration time? >>>=20 >>> no >>>=20 >>>> Are you certain that no consumer has got the msg already? >>>=20 >>> yes, there's no record of it arriving at the consumer and no log of = it in the kahadb data store >>>=20 >>> the producer sent 49 messages in 2 seconds.The 43rd and 46th = messages disappeared. They never reached the broker it would seem. >>>=20 >>> ------------------------------------ >>> Alistair Young >>> =C0rd-Innleadair air Bathar-Bog >>> UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20