activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dcheckoway <dchecko...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Slave not replicating consumption with Pure Master Slave
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:04:03 GMT
You bet:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3489

Thanks for looking into this!

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Torsten Mielke-2 [via ActiveMQ] <
ml-node+3799146-1429956855-140184@n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just gave it a quick test here using the latest 5.5 release and there
> does indeed seem to be an issue.
> Was sending and consuming msgs on the master broker using a new queue and
> the JMX properties got updated correctly on both master and slave.
>
> However when sending some msgs to queue example.A which also has a Camel
> consumer connected, I noticed the same problem as reported here. On the
> slave the Enqueue Count rises correctly but dequeue and dispatch count
> remain 0. QueueSize is at EnqueueCount number, despite all msgs being
> consumed already.
>
> I further noticed the following error in the slave log:
>
> WARN | Async error occurred: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot lookup
> a connection that had not been registered:
> ID:mac.fritz.box-53812-1315495654277-4:1
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot lookup a connection that had not
> been registered: ID:mac.fritz.box-53812-1315495654277-4:1
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.MapTransportConnectionStateRegister.lookupConnectionState(MapTransportConnectionStateRegister.java:97)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.lookupConnectionState(TransportConnection.java:1444)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processRemoveProducer(TransportConnection.java:530)
>
>         at org.apache.activemq.command.RemoveInfo.visit(RemoveInfo.java:78)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConnection.java:316)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:180)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.onCommand(ResponseCorrelator.java:116)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFilter.java:69)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VMTransport.iterate(VMTransport.java:218)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner.runTask(DedicatedTaskRunner.java:98)
>
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner$1.run(DedicatedTaskRunner.java:36)
>
>
>
>
> There seems to be a problem here.
>
> Dan, if you have the time, could you raise a new JIRA for this problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Torsten Mielke
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3799146&i=0>
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3799146&i=1>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Gary Tully wrote:
>
> > there are quite a few issues backing up against the pure master slave
> > (nothing shared) support, as a feature, it is not getting much love.
> > Most folks use a shared file system or shared db, so shared store
> > setup so that is where most of the work is focused.
> > A 2 broker network can give your producers some level of fault
> > tolerance, but total order of messages will be lost and any messages
> > pending on a failed broker will remain there till it is restarted.
> > Best a network of shared store master/slave pairs
> >
> > On 8 September 2011 13:05, dcheckoway <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3799146&i=2>>
> wrote:
> >> Torsten/Gary,
> >>
> >> This (thread) talks about the master/slave issue I made reference to
> >> earlier...
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Dan Checkoway
> >> dcheckoway gmail com
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slave-not-replicating-consumption-with-Pure-Master-Slave-tp3767086p3798603.html
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://fusesource.com
> > http://blog.garytully.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slave-not-replicating-consumption-with-Pure-Master-Slave-tp3767086p3799146.html
>  To unsubscribe from Slave not replicating consumption with Pure Master
> Slave, click here<http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3767086&code=ZGNoZWNrb3dheUBnbWFpbC5jb218Mzc2NzA4Nnw3MDc4NzEwMTU=>.
>
>


-----
Dan Checkoway
dcheckoway gmail com
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slave-not-replicating-consumption-with-Pure-Master-Slave-tp3767086p3799200.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message