Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 sebastien.jourdain@kitware.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted
 sender)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Seb <sebastien.jourdain@kitware.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <CABObKxcCeP8nLZD8m1kkE=5eZ+GsSkB6TBdN3ms_EgbOSSV34A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1312927800.2751.9.camel@office>
References: <1312904313202-3730337.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <1312920859734-3731119.post@n4.nabble.com> <1312921340.2751.4.camel@office>
 <CABObKxen+8vjpPgX1Nq8jinQ28s1B1UV20tAcaQ3SfUcpzLXuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1312923006.2751.6.camel@office>
 <CABObKxc+hJ9Bk-dEQia6S2nYzPQqTc-r5c7SN26sEaJWJwDYwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1312927800.2751.9.camel@office>
Subject: Re: Segfault with ActiveMQ-CPP 3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_37977_12560389.1312928645602"

------=_Part_37977_12560389.1312928645602
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Tim,

The "throw()" that I'm talking about it because the API has changed
between activemq-cpp 3.1.x and activemq-cpp 3.4.
Now (3.4) the signature of the onMessage method and the destructor of
the MessageListener expect to throw an exception which was not the
case previously.

So I was wondering if a #defined was added when that API has changed,
so I can use it in my code to support any version of activemq-cpp.

Regarding, the trunk, on my Mac/Lion my application is still not
functional, but as I don't have any minimal use case, I will let that
on the side for now.

Thanks again,

Seb

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:10 PM, tabish121@gmail.com [via ActiveMQ]
<ml-node+3731429-1427594448-258395@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 14:57 -0700, Seb wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> So I give a try on Linux Ubuntu 9.4 with gcc 4.4.1 with the svn trunk
>> of activemq-cpp.
>>
>> I still get the same runtime error in the "createThreadInstance" with
>> the sample code.
>>
>> Although, when I use my code with the fix ( "throw()" added), it works
>> just fine.
>>
>> So I have 3 questions:
>> - what is the test that you are doing to validate that activemq-cpp is
>> fully working on the different targeted platform.
>> - what version should I use if my application target all Unix platform
>> ? (Mac OS X (Leo, Snow Leo, Lion), Linux)
>> - Is there any #define that I can use to add dynamically that
>> "throw()" in my code based on a #ifdef
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for your help,
>>
>> Seb
>>
>>
> If using a plain linux box then I'd use v3.4.0 as trunk is generally
> unstable.
>
> Don't know what throw() change you are making.
>
> For Mac trunk has the fixes needed for building on Mac which you could
> backport to 3.4.0. =C2=A0Once done then the unit and integration tests ca=
n be
> run to validate.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> ------------
> FuseSource
> Email: [hidden email]
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: tabish121
> Blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Segfault-with-ActiveMQ-CPP-3-4-0-tp=
3730337p3731429.html
> To unsubscribe from Segfault with ActiveMQ-CPP 3.4.0, click here.


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Segfaul=
t-with-ActiveMQ-CPP-3-4-0-tp3730337p3731462.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------=_Part_37977_12560389.1312928645602--