From users-return-28515-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Thu Aug 11 13:50:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF8C971BC for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24044 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2011 13:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 23761 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2011 13:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 23753 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2011 13:50:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:50:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:50:21 +0000 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so1312959qwf.2 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XEV1RLJaKRplElqwGimlTWvKMIY7a0PA96BS3rTLtow=; b=uCbGd8/SD/pfxqehvgJBFouLHv57ysrDK1oz70a73uJkOZIdG9bjrxl8M/ULyu5AtE Wwne76D/RRjLwQCMXmAE3gtRjrxQjEtd7bWIBrvwPR1THqS+e29CIWm3EIZPSyXOxgkA zg40nD+iG9IAMd1c7nOg/RcqTJkWB/jB/6BzA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.246.2 with SMTP id lw2mr7215118qcb.228.1313070600581; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.65 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1313057938497-3735439.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1307720064197-3588714.post@n4.nabble.com> <1307815529968-3590852.post@n4.nabble.com> <1308228330231-3602343.post@n4.nabble.com> <1310546315706-3664510.post@n4.nabble.com> <1310553762167-3664704.post@n4.nabble.com> <1313057938497-3735439.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:50:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Message loss in network of brokers - transactional send From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org the only disadvantage is the obvious one, and there will only be a duplicate dispatch in this case if the message is already acked. On 11 August 2011 11:18, oseymen wrote: > Hi there, > > Is it possible to let me know the disadvantages of disabling audit in kahadb > (apart from the obvious - duplicates won't be suppressed) please? > > Thanks, > Ozan > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-loss-in-network-of-brokers-transactional-send-tp3588714p3735439.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com