Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks! Slightly different question. Is there any reason why one
> shouldn't use vm transport?
Often it is sensible to have the broker as an external running
application, so it is available for procuders / consumers in other
processes even if your application is down. In my case, ActiveMQ is
the messaging middleware for several processes communicating with each
other. I wouldn't want it to go down if one of the parts goes of the
entire application goes down.
Best regards,
Martin
|