activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin C." <>
Subject Re: VM transport
Date Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:32:54 GMT

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <> wrote:
> Thanks! Slightly different question. Is there any reason why one
> shouldn't use vm transport?

Often it is sensible to have the broker as an external running
application, so it is available for procuders / consumers in other
processes even if your application is down. In my case, ActiveMQ is
the messaging middleware for several processes communicating with each
other. I wouldn't want it to go down if one of the parts goes of the
entire application goes down.

Best regards,

View raw message