activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <>
Subject Re: KahaDB Master/Slave?
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:43:07 GMT
Same thing.
Just different persistence adapters, KahaDB is the "preferred" one, it recovers much faster.

Hey Keith :)

On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Keith Mann wrote:

> We are developing our ActiveMQ architecture and we are hoping to understand how we might
evolve it as ActiveMQ continues to develop. Can anyone comment on the status of KahaDB Master
Slave, and/or on its benefits versus Shared File System Master Slave? I've been unable to
find much in the way of details on the subject.
> Thanks in advance,
> Keith Mann
> IT Architect (SOA)
> 407 ETR

View raw message