Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCE3B6F08 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99687 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2011 08:17:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 98619 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2011 08:17:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 98596 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2011 08:17:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.43] (HELO mail-fx0-f43.google.com) (209.85.161.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:17:10 +0000 Received: by fxg17 with SMTP id 17so2715344fxg.2 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:16:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dqmOtPaGrLmeU9T2sddD7ewc7jdBvZE+va6MHVuOncY=; b=apxVC9++TOoawLMvwZ4oWmcjdXh3NcNpXnc2ivookIp+zcIVYneKvd/CP9SZa1XUbf +DDAmYdlnJ+rFYr2+5D+VAJZoYHn9o+bvDczuHQFlgtKp2pneWa/dTj2XseUHFMNhosv P0ZAJ64RxiYrzdn0cXyjDb07YhwMwufVVKYVE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.21.24 with SMTP id h24mr1392923fab.75.1311927408895; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.73.206 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:16:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1311923921487-3703254.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1310125397056-3653804.post@n4.nabble.com> <1311923921487-3703254.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:16:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m157pcE-iP7pyEfAPtJFAYfCS3k Message-ID: Subject: Re: AMQ 5.4.1 File Descriptor (FD) leak of ticots loopback networks From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517447e502da63b04a930e720 --001517447e502da63b04a930e720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, is there a chance you can test nio with 5.5.0 or the latest 5.6-SNAPSHOT and see if problem is still there? A test case would be great if you manage to provide it. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:18 AM, mickhayes wrote: > Update on this File Descriptor Leak with 5.4.1 broker and NIO transport - > how > to workaround/avoid. > The leak *stops* when transport changed to TCP in broker xml. > The leak *resumes *when transport changed back to NIO. > I.e. this fault is only seen with NIO transport. > I will update with a test case when I have one. > > > ----- > Michael Hayes B.Sc. (NUI), M.Sc. (DCU), SCSA SCNA > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-5-4-1-File-Descriptor-FD-leak-of-ticots-loopback-networks-tp3653804p3703254.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001517447e502da63b04a930e720--