Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AECB765A8 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48576 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 14:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 48275 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 14:11:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 48267 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2011 14:11:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:11:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.41] (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:11:28 +0000 Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so5368423fxg.28 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:11:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kMD57mzg+80lLdcyXM5KnUZ36HQ1RKRvg8gT0I5iEXU=; b=fVssCfHi9zPsjT6Gdy93nyVFpOsy1+J93ON8HedDUkogJMs06VGpK8iQKlhrUkZ/9V FlsEDZgpYbjmYTP1f7mBAE833uakPOFNFtY6lQJU6foM+EckCY4e2SElIIrnd7qnkL9k FRsXaEBpzco5BD7S1okrJ/BaZRK3oR344e7t0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.68.193 with SMTP id w1mr1780790fai.85.1310566266662; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.96.8 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:11:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E1DA424.9030704@iweb.com> References: <4E1DA424.9030704@iweb.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:11:06 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R0gTiLVDYb4GfV2jITS2VNe8BeQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible memory leak From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a59fc76e4004a7f3fc61 --20cf3054a59fc76e4004a7f3fc61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, can you test the latest release 5.5.0 (or the latest 5.6-SNAPSHOT) and confirm that problem still exists? Regards --=20 Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.co= m ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Simon-Pierre LeBel wrote= : > Hi, > > I have the following setup: > - ActiveMQ 5.3.2 > - Pure Master/Slave > - ~800 consumers > - ~320 queues > - ~650 topics > > My monitoring shows that the memory usage is going up daily, in 5 days > the heap used went up by 50MB without any changes in consumers, queues > or topics count. I tried to force GC but the memory usage doesn't go > down which is probably caused by a memory leak. > > I've attached screenshots of heap profiling done with MAT, the first one > was done on monday, the second today. The biggest difference between the > two days is org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat memory usage. > > Can you help me identify the cause and fix this issue ? > > Let me know if you need more informations. > > Regards, > > -- > Simon-Pierre LeBel [iWeb] > IT Architecture Specialist / Technical Lead > Sp=E9cialiste de l'Architecture TI / Leader Technique > http://www.iWeb.com/ > > --20cf3054a59fc76e4004a7f3fc61--