Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMH6+axwGLmRf+FfOF+o3UE8EcF4dqFw=gsQ+dOfT3fSjHNaGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGZ-RDL5CNFGfqRdi2M3kn3raAbWTP8JN+sSSYrjcJa6WHAnFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMH6+azFNidD8T7kXaS5Jjs6znqvnnOaB7hJiBtxcHZF_9mMmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGZ-RD+2Y19UP1nY0grWpT+SoMu86==pu337vFbrQEE6MK0oQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMH6+axwGLmRf+FfOF+o3UE8EcF4dqFw=gsQ+dOfT3fSjHNaGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:27:41 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGZ-RDLGXXqqJjkiQOKFTVm90_gVVXG-Pzrdc5Lti7FMbWR3nw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apollo 1.0 Beta 4 Released
From: Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes,

We intend to add transports back in to get to feature parity /w
ActiveMQ 5 where it makes sense.  Which transport is it that interests
you?


Regards,
Hiram

FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/


On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:04 PM, James Green <james.mk.green@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> Do you intend on adding additional transports to Apollo then? Or will it
> "inherit" ActiveMQ's additional transports when folded back in?
>
> On 7 July 2011 16:40, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>> No. =A0This is just a new messaging engine with a different
>> architecture. =A0It has a reduced set of features when compared to
>> ActiveMQ 5.x. =A0The hopes are that it will eventually contain enough
>> features to become the engine that drives the next major revision of
>> ActiveMQ. This is a little similar to when Tomcat developed the
>> Catalina engine.
>>
>> So, eventually Apollo will be folded back into the main ActiveMQ
>> project. =A0It's being released independently with a reduced feature set
>> to encourage early adoption and help solidify and make it more robust
>> by the time the ActiveMQ project uses it for ActiveMQ 6.0.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Green <james.mk.green@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Is ActiveMQ to be discontinued in favour of this in the future?
>> >
>> > On 7 July 2011 16:26, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The Apache ActiveMQ Project is pleased to announce the availability o=
f
>> >> Apollo 1.0 Beta 4. ActiveMQ Apollo is a faster, more reliable, easier
>> >> to maintain messaging broker built from the foundations of the
>> >> original ActiveMQ. It is focused on being the fastest most reliable
>> >> STOMP 1.1 and 1.0 server available.
>> >>
>> >> Read more about the release at:
>> >> http://activemq.apache.org/apollo/blog/releases/release-1-0-beta4.htm=
l
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Hiram
>> >>
>> >> FuseSource
>> >> Web: http://fusesource.com/
>> >>
>> >
>>
>