Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 682E36C32 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67621 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2011 19:13:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 67578 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2011 19:13:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 67569 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2011 19:13:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:13:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of yoshiroll@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:13:50 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qm9Xu-00037z-67 for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:13:30 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:13:30 -0700 (PDT) From: TwistedYosh To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1311794010177-3699545.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: ActiveMQ 5.5 Network of Brokers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello All, I am currently running in a network of broker configuration with two brokers. When a message is produced on one broker and then transfer to the 2nd broker we occasionally receive a message that the broker is removing interest in the sub on vm://xxxxxxxxx. When the occurs the consumer never gets the message. what is unique about this issue is that it is always the same message that has the issue. This message is slightly larger then the rest at 2059.. When we shutdown and only use one broker we never see this problem. Thank you, TwistedYosh -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-5-Network-of-Brokers-tp3699545p3699545.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.