From users-return-28139-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Thu Jul 7 19:41:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93B844E63 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 19:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40451 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2011 19:41:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40413 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2011 19:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40403 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2011 19:41:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:41:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.171] (HELO mail-vx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.220.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:41:03 +0000 Received: by vxh11 with SMTP id 11so1224770vxh.2 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lnatMOPKprPWDQ9Y557nqlMdVBTVDtYcdYN7YkL3H4s=; b=VMox9JPdP3Z9ZcAO48j9Hu/dzghdHzQY58n95a7w2DxREZaTHBmXPwCEMWdVa1s2qG dR9HbnFbknRrTVQLg6JaTudxoVGgjLl/A73r7mmkI6ZntdNTC9wD+O4ydXwAIkDUXXA5 Vm11ppRowsJFc2liMV60gPlv2VRXK6SGzVaBA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.161.230 with SMTP id xv6mr1685638vdb.123.1310067642246; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: chirino@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.167.165 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:40:42 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LuwnU4FLi1wIaXXzMnZfqIPvVlQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apollo 1.0 Beta 4 Released From: Hiram Chirino To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >From the point of view of the clients, yes. We may need to develop a migration script of procedure to migrate ActiveMQ 5 deployments. Regards, Hiram FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com/ On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Tommy Chheng wrote= : > To chime in as well, I'm currently using openwire with activemq via apach= e > camel. > > Once openwire is added to apollo, will upgrading be essentially just > switching the server uri? > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hiram Chirino wro= te: > >> Yes, >> >> We intend to add transports back in to get to feature parity /w >> ActiveMQ 5 where it makes sense. =A0Which transport is it that interests >> you? >> >> >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> FuseSource >> Web: http://fusesource.com/ >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:04 PM, James Green >> wrote: >> > Do you intend on adding additional transports to Apollo then? Or will = it >> > "inherit" ActiveMQ's additional transports when folded back in? >> > >> > On 7 July 2011 16:40, Hiram Chirino wrote: >> > >> >> No. =A0This is just a new messaging engine with a different >> >> architecture. =A0It has a reduced set of features when compared to >> >> ActiveMQ 5.x. =A0The hopes are that it will eventually contain enough >> >> features to become the engine that drives the next major revision of >> >> ActiveMQ. This is a little similar to when Tomcat developed the >> >> Catalina engine. >> >> >> >> So, eventually Apollo will be folded back into the main ActiveMQ >> >> project. =A0It's being released independently with a reduced feature = set >> >> to encourage early adoption and help solidify and make it more robust >> >> by the time the ActiveMQ project uses it for ActiveMQ 6.0. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Hiram >> >> >> >> FuseSource >> >> Web: http://fusesource.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Green >> >> wrote: >> >> > Is ActiveMQ to be discontinued in favour of this in the future? >> >> > >> >> > On 7 July 2011 16:26, Hiram Chirino wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> The Apache ActiveMQ Project is pleased to announce the availabilit= y >> of >> >> >> Apollo 1.0 Beta 4. ActiveMQ Apollo is a faster, more reliable, eas= ier >> >> >> to maintain messaging broker built from the foundations of the >> >> >> original ActiveMQ. It is focused on being the fastest most reliabl= e >> >> >> STOMP 1.1 and 1.0 server available. >> >> >> >> >> >> Read more about the release at: >> >> >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/apollo/blog/releases/release-1-0-beta4.html >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Hiram >> >> >> >> >> >> FuseSource >> >> >> Web: http://fusesource.com/ >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- > @tommychheng > http://tommy.chheng.com >