Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of norman.maurer@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ovRks7D1gjQM4bKaCeTeMffJy/YzcdawRW58N1cFM6oBoH7TAvC/DhqPvYazfW4iC+
         jiz4ewazeGyfTyIAJFzs4uZDJyBwa10ga8JO8CFaOswS2u4agqB4H0ZGgMZHsWjAQisf
         31XgJ5ftvPTBCd6eARU6elaDBtylZ8w19Mbbo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=u83rNjDT9XtfJ3UP5QX018D68kA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1308898005830-3621799.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<1309181892684-3627740.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<BANLkTi=yXHebhH9f8wWr6Ne2UKx9kEnwBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E088A27.1060502@apache.org>
	<1309182993777-3627771.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<4E088C80.5060405@apache.org>
	<1309188451120-3627996.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<BANLkTi=u83rNjDT9XtfJ3UP5QX018D68kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:44:53 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=Havb9moVmq+FcZZiKr_oQBi-E+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Anyone using Embedded Broker in production?
From: Norman Maurer <norman.maurer@googlemail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do you know if there will be a ActiveMQ 5.5.1 release for AMQ-3276 ?

Bye,
Norman


2011/6/27 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>:
> While AMQ-3276 is ugly, I don't think it can cause any message loss.
> btw: =A0that issue is resolved in the fusesource.com distro of 5.5 so
> you may want to take that for a spin.
> http://repo.fusesource.com/nexus/content/repositories/releases/org/apache=
/activemq/apache-activemq/5.5.0-fuse-00-27/
>
>
> On pure master slave, that is limited in that automated recovery is
> not possible. I would suggest you go with a shared storage
> master/slave setup where the store is hosted on a shared file system
> like a san/gfs or uses a replicated database.
>
> On 27 June 2011 16:27, Vijay <vijayender.bandaru@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Gary, can we have your input here.. Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Anyo=
ne-using-Embedded-Broker-in-production-tp3621799p3627996.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://fusesource.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>