Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEBBE6CD9 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46583 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46553 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46545 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:22:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:22:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,RISK_FREE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.43] (HELO mail-fx0-f43.google.com) (209.85.161.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:22:38 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3801305fxm.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q3mz5bb3O7vS/qfcWM1xtFvNOSFfQevPhmy02CErp3U=; b=jF3tG7oZJnLnJn9BH4DwZsNSYltji7Ok8Jkd2ErcHJKInu+PW0+peZWKh9KY3IkQSM Az1nJ2eK/y/g5qJRSlFPcBQdaVOatm/qs6W3G7Zf6E37+5JARxqyzHSbcOBvgq87crBe RJZ2w27xGtbAqqJTQKobBUsMOq+R+ypnqHl5U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=h609K1JQZGUqg7QfiBU1nnioq9ZXJlRijUkw7ljKI0/3QbEdy43tEV2lQYTYjaOy2Y PX9t7soZtxOlVkzLEJTFj1/mAwfnyp0J3x4z07SXyK5OE0CdvJLevf5zpHViET4hiajO chlGIqnsnKxPIG0SnRRCDd4EXfKXvSwgpiLk8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.47.209 with SMTP id o17mr289307faf.129.1307978538366; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.96.201 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1307968240968-3593736.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1307968240968-3593736.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:22:18 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: T8PUOluH4B1dAyzsmFYvM4s_9Wo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possibility of message loss in composite queues From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747598c27389804a5997c8b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151747598c27389804a5997c8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is no risk of losing messages, as the send is still atomic operation. So the producer will be notified that send succeeded only when all destinations have the message. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net --00151747598c27389804a5997c8b--