Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F19B76C67 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 09:43:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 99032 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 09:43:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 99024 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 09:43:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:43:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of andypiperuk@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:43:19 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRhx5-0003fm-6y for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:42:59 -0700 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:42:59 -0700 (PDT) From: andypiper To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1306921379206-3565365.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1306920524486-3565341.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1306336745101-3550031.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306491247857-3554856.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306850123204-3563168.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306864031120-3563819.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306865790923-3563904.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306865863667-3563911.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306867046431-3563960.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306873746887-3564232.post@n4.nabble.com> <1306920524486-3565341.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: RE: ActiveMQ integration with WebSphere MQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Simply because I don't know of another messaging server that will connect to a WMQ queue manager over sender/receiver channels, and if you use client connections (SVRCONN) you'll have no local queueing and have to handle connection broken error conditions in your app. Again, I may be misunderstanding how AMQ behaves here... If it's possible to use AMQ as your local queueing infrastructure and have that do the "buffering"/ bridging to WMQ as we discussed then ignore my assertion that you need WMQ both sides :-) Hope I've not confused everyone too much, I'm learning here too! ----- Andy Piper IBM WebSphere Messaging Community Lead http://andypiper.co.uk -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-integration-with-WebSphere-MQ-tp3550031p3565365.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.