Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: peterjca <peterca@ukgateway.net>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1306863430659-3563797.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1306850123204-3563168.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1306336745101-3550031.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <1306491247857-3554856.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <1306850123204-3563168.post@n4.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ integration with WebSphere MQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your response. We're waiting to see if the client and/or their
IBM support specialist can come up with a solution. Our application will
both send (for a  synchronous request/response -- yuck) and receive messages
from them. The main problem is that their system is a mish mash of legacy
this, that and the other, and one of the APIs we need to pull data from can
only be done via MQ. It's a shame it's not simply a web service. The receipt
of messages is the usual passive listening.

(I realised my comment about standards was misplaced after I posted! :) )


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-integration-with-WebSphere-MQ-tp3550031p3563797.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.