activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Are there any situations where I shouldn't use the NIO transport?
Date Mon, 23 May 2011 16:06:43 GMT
The only bit that is missing at the moment is SSL support.
see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2583

On 23 May 2011 16:36, Brendan Long <brendan@realgo.com> wrote:
> I asked this on StackOverflow too but didn't many responses, so I
> figured I'd try it here:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6062807/nio-disadvantages-in-activemq
>
> I've seen several optimization guides saying that one step is to enable
> NIO because it uses fewer threads, and that seems like good advice. What
> confuses me is that it's not the default, which implies to me that
> there's some reason not to use it, but I can't seem to find *any*
> reasons not to enable this. We're not having performance problems at the
> moment, so I don't want to introduce more problems, but if there's no
> downside, I might as well use this. So is there any reason not to use
> the NIO transport?
>



-- 
http://fusesource.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
View raw message