activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Native Clustering in ActiveMQ
Date Thu, 12 May 2011 05:11:36 GMT
Oh, 

Yes, then you are on the right track.
ActiveMQ supports 3 models.

Memory (Don't use this)
Disk (Use this for speed, niceness and whatnot else)
JDBC (It'll be slow)

/je

On May 11, 2011, at 11:06 PM, archa wrote:

> My requirement is as follows:
> 
> I have my application which currently write to a single broker queue.
> Incase the broker goes down, my messages are lost, till I restart the broker
> and the consumers again (as consumers are formed on application startup).
> 
> To avoid the loss of messages, I want sort of a master-slave configuration,
> so that when the master goes down, the slave broker continues consuming the
> messages, without requiring the message producer to change the broker ip in
> its configuration.
> 
> I read about master-slave configuration in
> http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html . Here it mentions about
> failover, but how is the failover mentioned in the activemq.xml (cant see it
> in the example given in that url). Also, will the failover be same for the
> master and slave, as it is a cluster ?
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Native-Clustering-in-ActiveMQ-tp3516488p3516511.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message