Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jamesc.000@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=NT3YLCJ/YTsWrrf8yKxBm/Aey4b2PWOjxczpD5HiKeCfFnOYAOGINt4boZpkzyl28p
         O6uIRn+q/7plDhs+fUloD5ME3ITO47KvU8Hy/R+Dy3sYeB4lh1BLNn3hsNb4IG2m96e7
         sfSkp9tU2KEusGbrH+tSESE6wBnaIEgB0/4ZM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87936EAF7CFD504B80F2AA68845673031337F5@LWEXMB02.usa.int>
References: <87936EAF7CFD504B80F2AA68845673031337F5@LWEXMB02.usa.int>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:00:37 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=2dGz+PbqNZNgD55zPvdZzMKU-DA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best way to remotely monitor AMQ 5.x installation via .NET?
From: James Casey <jamesc.000@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Cc: "Mike J. Kitchin" <Mike.Kitchin@tideworks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mike,

We've used JMX4Perl successfully for this :
<http://search.cpan.org/~roland/jmx4perl/>.

It's got good nagios integration too.

cheers,

James.

On 4 April 2011 21:57, Mike J. Kitchin <Mike.Kitchin@tideworks.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We use AMQ extensively in our enterprise to integrate our C++ and C# appl=
ications (CMS & NMS API's, respectively) and would like to integrate runtim=
e monitoring of the broker into an existing, web-based monitoring mechanism=
 built into one of our applications.
>
> This mechanism already integrates a fair amount of information from acros=
s our products but is, nonetheless, .NET based. After experimenting with wh=
at AMQ advisory messages and JMX can provide, I've concluded the JMX MBean-=
hosted information already available in AMQ would be the best source of pro=
cess utilization- and stability-type information, but haven't found a.NET c=
lient for JMX, presumably because standards JMX connectors are RMI-based.
>
> The best option, therefore, seems to be some sort of RESTFul JMX bridge o=
r the like that I can then proxy from our monitoring mechanism. Is there an=
y collective experience with these sorts of add-ons to AMQ and, if so, whic=
h sounds like the most straightforward and trouble-free approach?
>
> Please let me know if I may provide any additional information. Thanks.
>
> -Regards,
> MjK
>
> - - - - -
>
> "Here lies Zeke, second-fastest draw in Cripple Creek."
> - Epitaph (Cripple Creek, CO)
>
> Michael J. Kitchin =A0(Senior Software Engineer)
> Tideworks Technology
> http://www.tideworks.com
>
>
>