activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Force a failover re-randomize?
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:13:19 GMT
replace "network" with "cluster" or "master/slave pairs" or
"collection" it does not make any difference. The enhancement is that
a connection in a pool will get a chance to be randomized again by the
failover transport.

The relationship between the brokers, if any, is independent.

On 13 April 2011 16:03, nnprasad <NNakarikanti@dwd.in.gov> wrote:
> The link which Gary gave..saying
>
> "It might make sense to restrict the lifetime of connections in a connection
> pool, so that once in a while the connection is refreshed providing a chance
> of connection load balancing over a network of brokers."
>
> and here the main poster of this message told that he is *not* using the
> network of brokers
>
>
> I am confused. Please explain in your leisure.
>
> Thank You
> Nag.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Force-a-failover-re-randomize-tp3445497p3447393.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message