activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fred Moore <fred.moor...@gmail.com>
Subject Fwd: Can I use Active MQ in this Regard?
Date Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:58:07 GMT
...my 2 cent worth:

1\ Messages can be processed transactionally (similarly to ACID database
transactions, minus the "I": no isolation is guaranteed, but no isolation is
required; e.g. think about fast & paralled message consumption by
independedent consumer applications under independent units of work with
minimalistic locking)

3\ In a well tuned system queues tend to be empty (very deep queues during
workload peaks are of course "normal"), while in a well tuned system
database tables tend to be full, i.e. think of queues as a transient store,
not as a long term system of record.

4\ queues are fast, very fast <http://activemq.apache.org/performance.html>

Cheers,
F.

PS: ...interestingly the queues vs databases thing was discussed by late Jim
Gray (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Gray_(computer_scientist)) back in
1995 (!) in his seminal paper "Queues are databases" (
http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=69641), which
stirred up a big debate in the industry.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message