activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike J. Kitchin" <Mike.Kitc...@Tideworks.com>
Subject RE: Best way to remotely monitor AMQ 5.x installation via .NET?
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:34:31 GMT
Not really going to cut it, I'm afraid. We're trying to keep our deployments as compact as
we can, so preferably something limited to just broker addons and things we can do in .NET
to proxy the information for our monitoring tool.

Please let me know if I may provide any additional information. Thanks.

-Regards,
MjK

- - - - -

"Here lies Zeke, second-fastest draw in Cripple Creek."
- Epitaph (Cripple Creek, CO)

Michael J. Kitchin  (Senior Software Engineer)
Tideworks Technology
http://www.tideworks.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Casey [mailto:jamesc.000@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 1:01 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Cc: Mike J. Kitchin
> Subject: Re: Best way to remotely monitor AMQ 5.x installation via
> .NET?
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> We've used JMX4Perl successfully for this :
> <http://search.cpan.org/~roland/jmx4perl/>.
> 
> It's got good nagios integration too.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> James.
> 
> On 4 April 2011 21:57, Mike J. Kitchin <Mike.Kitchin@tideworks.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > We use AMQ extensively in our enterprise to integrate our C++ and C#
> applications (CMS & NMS API's, respectively) and would like to
> integrate runtime monitoring of the broker into an existing, web-based
> monitoring mechanism built into one of our applications.
> >
> > This mechanism already integrates a fair amount of information from
> across our products but is, nonetheless, .NET based. After
> experimenting with what AMQ advisory messages and JMX can provide, I've
> concluded the JMX MBean-hosted information already available in AMQ
> would be the best source of process utilization- and stability-type
> information, but haven't found a.NET client for JMX, presumably because
> standards JMX connectors are RMI-based.
> >
> > The best option, therefore, seems to be some sort of RESTFul JMX
> bridge or the like that I can then proxy from our monitoring mechanism.
> Is there any collective experience with these sorts of add-ons to AMQ
> and, if so, which sounds like the most straightforward and trouble-free
> approach?
> >
> > Please let me know if I may provide any additional information.
> Thanks.
> >
> > -Regards,
> > MjK
> >
> > - - - - -
> >
> > "Here lies Zeke, second-fastest draw in Cripple Creek."
> > - Epitaph (Cripple Creek, CO)
> >
> > Michael J. Kitchin  (Senior Software Engineer)
> > Tideworks Technology
> > http://www.tideworks.com
> >
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message