Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12215 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 14:53:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 14:53:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25674 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 14:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25266 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 14:53:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25253 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 14:53:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:53:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.43] (HELO mail-ew0-f43.google.com) (209.85.215.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:53:45 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2977362ewy.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:53:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zb98kh9b+CDG9UKoAhCFPlT0XpdYBkde5/z3t2jlGQA=; b=nPy3zaA2OTKsdJyLscfMEx3VZYj41jbk+p3wv+Hdj4Y9+GrQv2wq1d4Jg4VRBkGlo0 cpCVeX57HvxUjCn/ucGw1zZ+iR5LF+eTwRJ99CQj1MSkohV0Rxd/bmHb67ksnzKFZBzi LEilM/SKWNIvw1CGmYW2NX1JlsA4L6KaW3x/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=MCoyTE4iuRPuCkJziUN9nrtsMOFbddbCN1MXOMnE7I8wEVWKVtQfZyAUxHnumVcCTd XCdQEHUGqPCXLWWj/vbnrcOVvtevqZ1nBHYcDT8IVaSq9XIsBJCCjSTJGGoa8vcwU8jq sofUdndI2sLblQLDyEdWgFvVhKcyyzB2ZsEkQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.4 with SMTP id c4mr3777411ebq.30.1295276004817; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:53:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.35.145 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:53:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1295134034787-3219583.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1295134034787-3219583.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:53:24 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -iQlpXUNjJSqRANQJzxbkaVN0JI Message-ID: Subject: Re: a top website with millions of page views migrating from morbidq restq to activemq From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Prasanna, I'd suggest use of Apache Camel (http://camel.apache.org) to do this bridge between broker and the http server Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ----------------- FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging. Email: dejanb@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: =A0http://twitter.com/dejanb ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:27 AM, myprasanna wrote: > > hey guys, > > we are migrating from: > > www.morbidq.com/trac/wiki/RestQ > > to activemq. we would like to keep the interfacing intact, and want to kn= ow > where to extend activemq so that we can maintain all the application logi= c > at a web-server. for those unfamiliar with restq, it allows you to receiv= e > web-callbacks for 5 simple events: connect, disconnect, subscribe, > unsubscribe, send_message; and the web-server can determine if any of the= se > have to be allowed or not. > > what we want to do now is to extend activemq so that we continue to recei= ve > these callbacks. if we can write the extensions in ruby, that's most > preferred, but java is OK, if it's going to be a simple set of calls. any > high level guidance as to how to achieve this is highly appreciated. it > seems like i have to extend a bunch of classes if i'm not wrong? > > cheers, > -prasanna > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/a-top= -website-with-millions-of-page-views-migrating-from-morbidq-restq-to-active= mq-tp3219583p3219583.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >