Return-Path: 
 <users-return-26072-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18626 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 90864 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90835 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90827 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2010 10:06:26 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:06:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcjau-user-2@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender)
Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:06:18 +0000
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcjau-user-2@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1POSWa-0003f7-9Z
	for users@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:05:56 +0100
Received: from polaris.2e-systems.com ([217.86.139.180])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <users@activemq.apache.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:05:56 +0100
Received: from aleksandar by polaris.2e-systems.com with local (Gmexim 0.1
 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <users@activemq.apache.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:05:56 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: users@activemq.apache.org
From: Aleksandar Ivanisevic <aleksandar@ivanisevic.de>
Subject: stomp+nio+ssl
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:05:45 +0100
Organization: Individual
Lines: 3
Sender: alex@alex.2e-systems.com
Message-ID: <m3ipzbgohy.fsf@alex.2e-systems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: polaris.2e-systems.com
Original-Sender: aleksandar@ivanisevic.de
X-Face: 
 "4JwcMHVV7.+Q"O&7#~e!/D3&-We*\6>YCmt~!;eHB\Qc$GGC}v}V[BFN]+pX;wqky_vXgj
 Ag!*"Am:~ffPJV&#cV*0"NeN9I]gaK$eDg`>`!5Ep&J_:/#KPnG3g.u|DV]i7P@l#46^UkNF\#"N%Q
 s9VP9Clc>qmNO$c(.^"2~nkJ.0LC+F{"sZI@+Ut
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GKqxD+4VmF7QLrESIEIEpBkr0mQ=


Is it possible to have stomp+nio+ssl? Or it doesn't make sense since
the SSL overhead will eat the gains from nio?