Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=BCKp0qjWDaetV9ugsEeDKld6E1HsefxBa4L7hAKXb6ffS3l+Qkigsk2VRCW3MXJVNW
         Oza/BbxiQD0HBBQGyfUvZIhdMerZAx7RERV/vDfCldzQTu7opZnWrSi84CHsCRKJPptI
         SF1929WPqSBNQt3SFkgEZR+uwEhqKW0PIZkj4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1292868026191-3095911.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1292868026191-3095911.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:44:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=puHLXJN1=Kk-ptMVAXd_7hV8McBiBJiF2G2XW@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FailoverTransport rebinding to master
From: Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ken,

we don't have this feature at the moment. You can raise a feature
request in Jira (and take a stab at implementing it).

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
-----------------
FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging.
Email: dejanb@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: =A0http://twitter.com/dejanb
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:00 PM, ken.mccracken <ken.mccracken@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the FailoverTransport via the following config:
> failover:(tcp://primary:61616,tcp://secondary:61616)?randomize=3Dfalse
>
> My question is, if I bring up two ActiveMQ servers at primary and seconda=
ry,
> and they are both up, messages will be produced to the primary. =A0When t=
he
> primary goes down, messages will be send to the secondary. =A0When the pr=
imary
> comes back online, messages continue to be sent to the secondary. =A0Is t=
here
> a way to make it "rebind" to the primary, or check if primary is again
> available every 5 minutes or so?
>
> The reason is that I want to use my ActiveMQ cluster in an active-active
> setup with multiple hosts distributed to multiple ActiveMQs. =A0When one
> ActiveMQ goes down, traffic should switch to the other; when that ActiveM=
Q
> is brought back online, traffic should again re-distribute.
>
> Should I use a different Transport? =A0Do I need to write my own to have =
this
> behavior?
>
> Thanks!
> -Ken McCracken
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failo=
verTransport-rebinding-to-master-tp3095911p3095911.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>