activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksandar Ivanisevic <aleksan...@ivanisevic.de>
Subject Re: Slow throughput after several hundred messages
Date Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:18:29 GMT

Not really. Just tested on 5.4.1-fuse and messages are gone with the
wind ;)

Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
writes:

> with the caveat that there is no durability of the message. But yes,
> when a durable sub is offline, the persistent messages will be held in
> memory.
>
> On 14 December 2010 15:38, Aleksandar Ivanisevic
> <aleksandar@ivanisevic.de> wrote:
>> Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
>> writes:
>>
>>> if you set persistent=false on BrokerService, (broker in xml config)
>>> it will use an in memory store.
>>
>> And durable topics will keep working as they should?
>>
>>>
>>> On 14 December 2010 10:01, Aleksandar Ivanisevic
>>> <aleksandar@ivanisevic.de> wrote:
>>>> Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
>>>> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Non persistent messages can be sent to a durable sub, but the durable
>>>>> sub will only get the messages if it connected, a backlog will not be
>>>>> retained as the messages will not be stored
>>>>> It will behave like a regular topic subscription in this regard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, thats what I figured too. Is it possible to configure AMQ to
>>>> have persistance store only in memory? Or do I have to wrangle tmpfs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ti si arogantan, prepotentan i peglaš vlastitu frustraciju. -- Ivan
>> Tišljar, hr.comp.os.linux
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://blog.garytully.com
> http://fusesource.com
>

-- 
Ti si arogantan, prepotentan i peglaš vlastitu frustraciju. -- Ivan
Tišljar, hr.comp.os.linux


Mime
View raw message