From users-return-26030-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Fri Nov 26 13:53:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61133 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 74928 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 74832 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 74824 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 13:52:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:52:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.43] (HELO mail-ew0-f43.google.com) (209.85.215.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:52:54 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1205436ewy.2 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:52:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dWtn+rNnLIU0xc1GlKcJE4BNkZ+5WbQYl1iSynxMpbI=; b=uz28+krv+J8dzpEpPVJZ6wVdN2uWQIrbZzEh/vRvQSDD4wT6s1e5eHziyX/+h1vodh Ki3c5jeBdC9py/yNa37POqVSUY2InxX60m66fReKEQOLf7guAP3OcMsb2ToBWx6qs6C/ pQG0CleJZqeL52WQv2N+YBsIaIGUX9E3ZyaPc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Ge5/jkLezPdR/pBxDDOOAG2aquoh2C/IX4ENr1JBT3PiuKp5WHxer8KjKIWFdZZs3b BWyT/28sZ9DoNGLTAOY2Pp/PohT1wQXl8Gapl94XiyMuAA65xwtr9qF2nA/6Hf/Q0Ndw tiYgDYynp9Ea4X3L6XVzpp2N9FS/Bh/jjmgzE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.21.130 with SMTP id j2mr3831375ebb.41.1290779553303; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:52:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.14.210 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:52:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:52:33 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UAsqgVmhk4OTBzEjPG_zWC0Yr8s Message-ID: Subject: Re: Selected messages not being passed between brokers From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi James, any chance you can create a test case that demonstrate this? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac ----------------- FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging. Email: dejanb@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: =A0http://twitter.com/dejanb ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, James Green wro= te: > Two 5.4.1 brokers A and B connected to each other via a duplex transport. > > Sender X fires a message on /queue/account_events to A, consumer Y collec= ts > from B. This is normal. > > Sender Z fires a message on /queue/account_events to A, consumer Y gets > nothing. This is abnormal. > > Check broker A, /queue/account_events shows one consumer connected while > consumer Y is connected to broker B. This is normal. > > I browse broker A's /queue/account_events in the web interface. No messag= es > listed despite multiple page re-loads and an increasing pending count as = a > result of Z's activity. This is abnormal. > > Nothing in the logs of either broker. Very very confused. How can sender = X's > messages get passed along but not sender Z's? > > James >