activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From magellings <mark.gelli...@qg.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 slower than ActiveMQ 5.2???
Date Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:25:06 GMT

Here is a our scenario (P= producer, C=consumer, BrKR = broker, t=topic,
vt=virtual topic)

                     |         |
  P1 -- vt1 --> |         | -- t1 (durable), vt1 ----> C1 ---- t2 ----> BrKR
1 
  P2 -- t1 -->  |         |
  P3 -- t1 -->  |BrKR 1| -- t1 (durable), t5 (durable) --> C2 -- t3 --> 
  P4 -- t2 -->  |         |                                                           
 
BrKR 2  --- t3 (durable), t4 ---> C4 
  P5 -- t2 --> |          | --- t1, t2 ------> C3 --- t4 -------------->
  P6 -- t5 --> |          |
                    |         | ---- vt1, t5 (durable) ---> C5 -- t2 -->
BrKR 1

    * First producer (P1) sends 10000 msgs to “VirtualTopic.t1”
    * Two producers (P2/P3) send 10000 msgs to t1.
    * Two producers (P4/P5) send 10000 msgs to t2.
    * One producer (P6) sends 10000 msgs to t5.

As the consumers then process the messages they also produce messages on
various topics.

We are using JDBC persistence, but we also were using it with our testing of
ActiveMQ 5.2.

-- 
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-4-1-slower-than-ActiveMQ-5-2-tp3048866p3048914.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message