Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71104 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:23:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 65936 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65880 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65865 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:22:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:22:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of krishna_seelam@hotmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:22:52 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.151]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PAqyV-00035H-Mr for users@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:22:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:22:31 -0700 (PDT) From: kseelam To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1288128151701-3014521.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: JDBC Master Slave approach with Journal for HA MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, For HA, we are planning to use JDBC Master Slave approach. We understand that the DB Lock controls the Master and Slave. But can we use High Performance Journal also with this JDBC Master Slave approach for HA? Is it supported ? If so, Should each Broker use its own local Journal (data directory) or Should they share the common file system data directory? Which one is appropriate? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you all. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-approach-with-Journal-for-HA-tp3014521p3014521.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.