Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31724 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:38:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 51426 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 51044 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:38:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 51036 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:38:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:38:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.158 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric.vincent@atosorigin.com) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:56 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.151]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9GsJ-0007rn-MY for users@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:37:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:37:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric-AWL To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1287751055693-3007120.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: 3 brokers, 1 Topic, 2 networks of brokers and networkTTL=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi It seems that even with "networkTTL=1", I have a network of brokers configuration where one message can be received more than one time by a topic consumer. I have a complex configuration, but I will try to explain a subset of this configuration that I suspect to be representative of my problem. broker A and broker B are connected together by a first network of broker "N1" half-duplex. A and B have the network connector (networkTTL = 1) and the transport connector (So, A is connected on B , and B is connected on A) for "N1" Broker C has a transport connector for a second network of broker "N2" full duplex A and B have the corresponding network connector (networkTTL=1) So A is connected on C, and B is connected on C for this network of brokers "N2". A and B have a consumer for a Topic T C has a producer for this Topic T Does this configuration (2 different networks of brokers, but A,B,C all connected together) can explain that a message produced by C can be received twice by A and B ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/3-brokers-1-Topic-2-networks-of-brokers-and-networkTTL-1-tp3007120p3007120.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.