activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Difference between kahaPersistenceAdapter and kahaDB
Date Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:30:40 GMT
KahaDB is a new implementation, the latest incarnation. KahaDB uses
less file file descriptors and provides faster recovery than its
predecessor, the AMQ message store.

On 25 October 2010 16:45, carlo.bonamico <carlo.bonamico@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have seen various configurations in both the ActiveMQ website and mailing
> list posts, alternatively using the <kahaPersistenceAdapter> and <kahaDB>
> elements in the xml configuration.
>
> Are the two syntaxes equivalent, or do they select different
> implementations/configurations? in case what are the
> advantages/disadvantages in terms of performance and reliability of the two
> approaches?
>
> Thanks in advance for your time and answers,
> Carlo
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3010514.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message