activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bobby Richards <bobby.richa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: web sockets
Date Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:50:05 GMT
I wish I could tell why one is working and one is not, more than
likely different versions of chrome I guess.

Thanks for the reply

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Hi Bobby,
>
> I just revisited websocket and it seems somewhat broken. We'll need to
> give it more attention soon. Any help (diagnosing, testing, coding) is
> greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Bobby Richards <bobby.richards@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was able to get the stomp-websocket demo running on one machine no
>> problem.  However, I went through the same steps on two machines, one
>> nearly identical (i know, i know), one not, and am unable to get the
>> same out of the box functionality.
>>
>> The machine that it is working on is running fedora 11 and ActiveMQ 5.4.1
>>
>> I have tried on fedora 12 and windows XP both using ActiveMQ 5.4.1,
>> with not changes to the AMQ config file other than adding the
>> <transportConnector> for stomp, openwire, and websocket.
>>
>> I also tried to see what was going on via wireshark but it looks like
>> both sides do the upgrade properly.
>>
>> I just get a lost connection to ws://localhost:61614/stomp almost immediatly.
>>
>> I realize this is very ambiguous.  I feel like I am just missing one
>> small piece.  I do have it running properly in one instance so I know
>> it works!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bobby
>>
>

Mime
View raw message