activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tracy Snell <tsn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JDBC Master Slave approach with Journal for HA
Date Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:42:47 GMT
In that scenario if your master's disk fails your messages are toast.  It also assumes the
master comes back online while the messages are still relevant. It's not a HA config.
On Oct 28, 2010, at 10:45 AM, kseelam wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> We have tested with 2 brokers as Master/slave, if any messages are not yet
> persisted (but they are in the Journal) while switching form master to
> slave; those messages are persisting fine when that broker become the Master
> again. Only downside is, those massages have to wait till that broker become
> the Master to be persisted. We did not find any messages loosing.  Any other
> downsides of this approach? 
> 
> Thanks lot
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-approach-with-Journal-for-HA-tp3014521p3017374.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message