activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JDBC Master Slave approach with Journal for HA
Date Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:31:26 GMT
The journal is not shared, so - no it is not a good idea for master/slave

http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html

On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:44 PM, kseelam wrote:

> 
> Also as per the 5.4.0 schema, there is a useDatabaseLock attribute in
> journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
> 
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.4.0-schema.html#journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
> 
> Element: journalPersistenceAdapterFactory
> 
> useDatabaseLock	xs:boolean	Sets whether or not an exclusive database lock
> should be used to enable JDBC Master/Slave. Enabled by default.
> 
> This allows us to use it Journal + Jdbc master/slave. 
> 
> Any downsides of using this? 
> 
> Thank you.
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-approach-with-Journal-for-HA-tp3014521p3016176.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Johan Edstrom

joed@opennms.org

They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither
liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759






Mime
View raw message