activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: load balancing in activemq
Date Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:48:45 GMT
I prefer sticky load balancing in production, so no accidental instances that get fired up
on the same network become part of the cluster.

On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Mot wrote:

> 
> if i have only one consumer and multiple brokers attached to it. then for
> load balancing which is better out of two either STICKY LOADBALANCING or
> AUTODISCOVERY????
> 
> IN WHICH CASE ACTIVEMQ PERFORMANCE IS HIGH?? 
> 
> please reply me.thanx
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/load-balancing-in-activemq-tp2546606p2546606.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message