activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: Thoughts on production worthiness of 5.4 ...
Date Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:29:47 GMT
Hi Ravi,

there has been a lot of improvements since 5.0 and many people uses
later versions in production. I'd certainly recommend testing the
latest release in your environment and report any potential problems
you might find.

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net



On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Ravi <extsknk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been using version 4.1.1 in production for the past several years
> and it has been 'rock solid'.
> Earlier we attempted to move to 5.0 and got burned badly.
>
> Can somebody comment on the stability/production worthiness of 5.4  for the
> following features ?
>
> - Durable topics
> - Virtual destination  of Topics/Queues
> - Kaha DB
> - Master/slave (especially ability to recover as documented by copying slave
> data dir to master)
>
> (the concern is not about message rate, basic stability - ability to run for
> months without restarts)
>
> Thank you
> Ravi
>

Mime
View raw message