activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: VM communication between two war
Date Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:37:15 GMT
The issue will be classloading, a war is supposed to be self
contained, so it should contain the activemq classes. If the activemq
classes are shared, part of the container system libraries and not
contained in the war, then the vm transport should work across wars.
The vm transport keeps track of servers in a static map, so this map
needs to be shared across the wars to be visible.

On 10 August 2010 20:26, cmdr <spcmdr@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to configure the communication between two war using activeMq
> VM protocol.
>
> I try vm://localhost?create=false for one war and vm://localhost for the
> second war but that does not work. The firts war is not able to connect to
> the broker.
>
> Regards
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/VM-communication-between-two-war-tp29401361p29401361.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message