Return-Path: 
 <users-return-24685-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72417 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2010 09:47:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2010 09:47:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 32613 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2010 09:47:33 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32275 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2010 09:47:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32267 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2010 09:47:29 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:47:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.43 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.43] (HELO mail-pw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.160.43)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:47:23 +0000
Received: by pwj6 with SMTP id 6so892204pwj.2
        for <users@activemq.apache.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8XTeJ6HrW23/6s8inTSE7/Nm+e0SQRu/qImitVTuJcc=;
        b=U14L0C+cZdVHQZUXIsP/265sM335sjbULmoocIr9VbKxxDNl+zwnpkvWKI+3bWV4FG
         P/heOGURsH6l83uxT3+BDOMkAaPLDWdLhcea/FlM3Tpc2xZqhhu1bWE3VBYs/yKe9Tvy
         5uU3ALcLXC7Jbjk3cXCuAxkvxd21cGf+nYc6k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vYLfxKRMsuUUKqAq1g3+wJT87S9+aRM1ANJyii3jqol3YKmDejdKZkaVtypx5dwjrK
         JdLujxEoxVLnwbbBJRsnKgejvnAbuQXkzKSnetyD54J/VYknHHzvlm0rk6i5jHizWax1
         YMRUt6E9biPBv6DLpCBZez4xHcin8EYRtA0uI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.164.3 with SMTP id m3mr1303105wfe.6.1280224021838;
 Tue, 27
	Jul 2010 02:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.231.12 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29269460.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <29255162.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<29255218.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<AANLkTimditng2MHA+jGL6L0OEf4O7M_o5UJMpr2zouTV@mail.gmail.com>
	<29265342.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<AANLkTimR0M+sw61dRSVLdw3Z31fJ2g6tSD7uDUQd=rMM@mail.gmail.com>
	<29267890.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<AANLkTim3X9XZPMC9ijmvdnk7BJU5r4qgQQ_f8do05mL-@mail.gmail.com>
	<29268175.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<AANLkTin98aFa+roJv_rA7nWBatXxqqvYoDTmKNm-qdea@mail.gmail.com>
	<29268323.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<29268960.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<29269460.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:47:01 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimj3TeLush+S4jd1pQdL-yVJtDP4Jsh7rvx+kBT@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Correct way to build a mesh of brokers
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

for future reference, the ordering of elements in the broker sequence
is alphabetical - <plugins> before <transportConnectors> and the
difference with 5.4 is that the xml configuration file is validated
against the schema. It was always alphabetical, just never enforced.

On 26 July 2010 19:31, ripienaar <rip@devco.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> ripienaar wrote:
>>
>> The configs for 5.3.2 is not compatible with 5.4, I'd say that renders 5=
.4
>> useless and I cannot test. =A0Given the state of the documentation, it
>> really is an unresolvable issue at this point for me.
>>
>> The XML config seem to have a fairly random behavior wrt ordering, what
>> works in 5.3.x doesnt work in 5.4-SNAPSHOT etc, the errors - pages full =
of
>> "meaningful" exceptions does not help.
>>
>
> Ordering issues seems to be related to the <plugins> section, it cannot n=
ow
> be after <transportConnectors>.
>
> With that sorted the dupes are gone in 5.4-SNAPSHOT.
>
> Does anyone have any view on when 5.4 might be out?
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Correct-way-to-build-=
a-mesh-of-brokers-tp29255162p29269460.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



--=20
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com