Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37902 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2010 08:23:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2010 08:23:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 26167 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2010 08:23:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 26133 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2010 08:23:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 26125 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2010 08:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.43] (HELO mail-fx0-f43.google.com) (209.85.161.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:23:03 +0000 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so538508fxm.2 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=LmWtScojVCUDoOxkCcxssSaEsE9cVDk5wNpfRe92Mso=; b=ZTEvekTZOXH7WnY5ucF/XmeXMNVyAfXrkYd6GCtfiAkWDGzKs+6/weHdk2HHS5wlsj khwUP465ND5lHxMrzo7GBE6NMQOj3PnZtR/EDXMUo8a4fkyPJcW7Q/HTYeas9k91RCXT gDsHXksKq1QKR2cakRCh+siwIE4d8Qv+4MJzk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=mSrVuqBct1OOBvwWlkUdbIJg2yv/17yQCnGdRS6+M0rukofLIWPNNm1MaKCHs2sl8P VWKXbD7QLAAKv8VkTFMWFDGmWDmS6b9cllDfwcCPXu124GFFo8ZvekAIWWv9Zbv+dcFT qzBDM9J7YPO3k7iy7T8AyTdOL+Qq54PMvRbEU= Received: by 10.239.138.79 with SMTP id o15mr774160hbo.15.1280218962048; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:22:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.138.83 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:22:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <29268467.post@talk.nabble.com> From: James Strachan Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:22:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JMSPriority and activeMQ To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 27 July 2010 07:01, wrote: > Yes, I reckon they should be int. Maybe setPriority should throw an > exception if the input priority is out of range. I'd have thought we'd have to add this to the JMS TCK as its a change in behaviour. Maybe for now just log a warning? That won't have any TCK issues -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/