Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84735 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 08:08:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 08:08:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 95747 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 08:08:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94919 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 08:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 93942 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2010 08:08:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:08:47 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OdIja-0000Wl-0A for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:08:26 -0700 Message-ID: <29264165.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Moravec To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Storage utilisation not decreasing when memory utilisation reaches 70% In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: pavel.moravec@acision.com References: <29248087.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't think so. See attached activemq.xml file. Gary Tully wrote: > > Is the advice from https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2834 > relevant to your use case? > > On 23 July 2010 15:32, Pavel Moravec wrote: >> >> Hello, >> we experience the following problem when using Active-MQ 5.3.2 for >> forwarding persistent messages. >> >> Time to time, consumers don't read mails from Active-MQ sufficiently fast >> so >> memory utilisation reaches 70%. Further mails are stored on disk and >> storage >> utilisation is growing. Once consumers are ready again, all the stored >> emails both from memory and disk are consumed. However, storage >> utilisation >> does not drop back to zero. >> >> Repeating the scenario above, I finished with (almost) no email in memory >> or >> in storage while storage usage is 100%. Active-MQ is not accepting new >> mails >> while it is not feeding consumers having nothing inside. A restart >> resolves >> the problem. >> >> Can't be there something wrong with the storage utilisation counter? Has >> somebody met the same issue already? >> >> Thanks in advance for a feedback. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Storage-utilisation-not-decreasing-when-memory-utilisation-reaches-70--tp29248087p29248087.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com > > http://old.nabble.com/file/p29264165/activemq.xml activemq.xml -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Storage-utilisation-not-decreasing-when-memory-utilisation-reaches-70--tp29248087p29264165.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.