Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21352 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2010 18:19:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jul 2010 18:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 27895 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 18:19:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27851 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27837 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2010 18:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:19:24 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OV7It-0001nN-9z for users@activemq.apache.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: <29065320.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:19:03 -0700 (PDT) From: zagiatakrapovic To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Solaris SPARC, queued messages never handled In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: zagiatakrapovic@gmx.ch References: <29063239.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hmmm using the example producer/consumer, sounds great to me, I will try that. Usually I'm running 5.3.2 but as I said, I tried all version back to 5.0 . thanks for your input ! Stan Lewis-4 wrote: > > What version are you running? Can you post the exact code the > consumer is using to connect and register it's message listener? Also > does this behavior happen with the example producer/consumer shipped > with activemq? > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:51 AM, zagiatakrapovic > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I experience a very strange problem. The software I'm maintaining is >> running >> under Windows, Linux and Solaris (x86, SPARC). Now with the new release >> everything seems fine except Solaris SPARC (v.10 and v.9). Under Solaris >> the >> queued messages are never processed. If I copy the very same installation >> folder to a Linux machine, everything works fine! >> We are using JMS to pass messages from one host to another (only in one >> direction) with help of a ssl-queue. >> In order to find the problem we turned on debugging in activemq and our >> software. We investigated the handshake, the transmission and the queue >> and >> its messages. Everything works fine. The messages are received and queued >> properly. But there is never a callback to the "onMessage()" method, >> registered as consumer of the queue (yes I have seen and tried: "I am not >> receiving any messages - what is wrong?"). >> >> We tried to switch of 'clientAuth' in ssl and even went to pure tcp:// >> connections with no changes of the behaviour. >> >> We thought that one possible problem with Solaris could be the long TCP >> timeout for connections with TIME_WAIT status. Even the program was >> stopped >> the queue connections were still present (in netstat) for about 2h. A >> restart of the program led to activemq connection problems, we are >> handling >> this issue by collecting the connection and disposing the queue. >> Nevertheless we corrected that using 'ndd' (after a long stfw-session). >> The >> timeout is now at the min. of 10s. >> I think we tried out every possible argument of tcp:// and ssl://, with >> no >> luck. >> Debugging with JMX did not work properly on Solaris (using FUSE, >> ActiveMQBrowser), we couldn't figure out how to properly set it up (we >> tried >> the url argument and the JVM argument) without changing code (querying >> the >> web has shown that we are not the only persons failing on this). JConsole >> did work out and we could verify that messages are received at least. >> >> The worst thing is we have no clue were to look further. There are no >> error >> messages at all. >> We also tried other versions of the activemq: 5.0 - 5.3.2, same result. >> >> Before we start to check every 'diff' in the new release compared to the >> old >> working one, I thought maybe someone could give me a hint were to look or >> how to collect more information about the problem. >> >> I know this short summary is everything else than complete or precise, >> hence >> I will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have .... >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Solaris-SPARC%2C-queued-messages-never-handled-tp29063239p29063239.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Solaris-SPARC%2C-queued-messages-never-handled-tp29063239p29065320.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.