activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Broker clustering with Mutlicast not working
Date Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:23:32 GMT
Can u use the 0.0.0.0 wildcard or ip address in the transport
connector instead of localhost.
A network is store nd forward, not replication, so a message will only
be on one of the brokers.

On Friday, July 9, 2010,  <Hammad.Said@gpj.com> wrote:
> I have two brokers, both embedded inside JBoss running on two different
> machines within the same network. I  have the following network and
> transport settings for the brokers:
>
> Broker1:
>        <networkConnectors>
>           <networkConnector uri="multicast://default"/>
>         </networkConnectors>
>
> <transportConnector uri="tcp://localhost:0"
> discoveryUri="multicast://default"/>
>
>
> Broker2:
>         <networkConnectors>
>           <networkConnector uri="multicast://default"/>
>         </networkConnectors>
>
> <transportConnector uri="tcp://localhost:0"
> discoveryUri="multicast://default"/>
>
>
> When i run the two brokers with these settings i see the network bridge
> error. But running two brokers with the same settings on my local machine
> runs fine.
>
> Related question is that if i have a producer and consumer with the
> following connection property:
>  <property name="brokerURL"
> value="discovery:(multicast://default)?initialReconnectDelay=100"/>
>
> provided the two brokers are connected, does it mean that when i send the
> message to the Queue running on one broker it would be copied to the other
> broker too? And does
> it mean that it would be consumed twice?
>
>
> Thanks!
> Hammad
>

-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message