activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: Administering an ActiveMQ / STOMP network.
Date Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:51:20 GMT
Hi Daniel,

this simply means that you didn't consume from these topics. What's
the number of consumers you are seeing on these topics?

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net



On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net> wrote:
> G'day.
>
> I don't know if this is the best place to ask sysadmin-focused questions about
> managing ActiveMQ in production, but I couldn't find anywhere better.
> Suggestions happily received.
>
>
> Anyway, we have a two-site deployment of ActiveMQ running one broker at each
> end, connected together to pass messages through.  This is all working fine,
> but it looks like some of the applications using it are doing something wrong.
>
> Specifically, I have a topic with "13,384 Messages Enqueued", and "0 Messages
> Dequeued", on the broker at both sites.
>
> I *hope* that means "13K messages were sent to this at some point", but the
> fact that it lists zero for dequeued is a bit worrysome.
>
>
> Worse, I can't find anything useful in the documentation; the JavaDOC tells me
> that the stats show the number of messages enqueued and dequeued, but not what
> those numbers actually mean...
>
>
> So, can someone help me out: is this normal, or should I panic about our
> broken software?
>
>        Daniel
> --
> ✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ daniel@rimspace.net            ☎ +61
401 155 707
>               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
>
>

Mime
View raw message