activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From radha_mit <>
Subject ActiveMQ persistence store option
Date Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:36:42 GMT

We are in dilemma in which persistence option to use for activeMQ.
we tested both local disk and NFs version 4 .
The NFSv4 was very slow when compared to the speed of local disk.
But we will be more comfortable with a master-slave topology.

Can any one suggest what else can we think so ?
Can lustre be a better option ?

View this message in context:
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

View raw message