Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31793 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2010 14:19:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Jun 2010 14:19:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 29830 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2010 14:19:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29790 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2010 14:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29782 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2010 14:19:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:19:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.marlow@uk.bnpparibas.com designates 155.140.122.252 as permitted sender) Received: from [155.140.122.252] (HELO lonmail6.bnpparibas.com) (155.140.122.252) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:19:03 +0000 X-BANNED: NO X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,460,1272841200"; d="scan'208";a="27665258" To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Temporary queues and a WAN MIME-Version: 1.0 From: andrew.marlow@uk.bnpparibas.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:18:42 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004E9E918025774A_=" --=_alternative 004E9E918025774A_= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" As per the advice at http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html I am using temporary Qs for my replies. But I think there is a problem. I am programming to an abstract interface of mine that I designed so that I can switch between activeMQ-cpp and IBM MQSeries. When I switch to IBM I get weird connectivity problems. I am told, by the IBM MQSeries admin that temporary Qs are not expected to work over WANs. My client is in Paris whilst the server is in London. Because of various technical obstacles that I wont go into here, I am only able to run with ActiveMQ locally. ActiveMQ is fine there and so is IBM-MQSeries. I am not able to see if ActiveMQ would still work in the WAN situation. But IBM does not seem to like it. What advice/recommendations do people have please? Regards, Andrew Marlow ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H for additional disclosures. --=_alternative 004E9E918025774A_=--