Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tabish121@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id
         :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aX92x9BOeaaIyhHUF2CkhOCNx+KgFNTGYkFzizHWoM/WNoIOnhB4+WnIF3YmRw60Dc
         QYrrUoxB8GTl/Ukd+xkHs8TYNN6FvWCYOpl94llqHqQlyiTCGHiZUOJeAk1nB5VogjAt
         5kQGV/tn14nyBL6Ru4h23VHiut1uZsNu4JVhU=
Subject: Re: how to detect on server side when queue manager has gone away?
From: Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <OF03D65550.832259E7-ON80257743.0035ECF6-80257743.003664AC@bnpparibas.com>
References: 
	 <OF03D65550.832259E7-ON80257743.0035ECF6-80257743.003664AC@bnpparibas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:23:56 -0400
Message-ID: <1276608236.2501.1.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:53 +0100, andrew.marlow@uk.bnpparibas.com
wrote:
> I am using AMQ-cpp without the failover feature, good though that feature 
> is. I am concerned with hwo to detect when the Q mgr has gone away. On the 
> client side I have found that if I send a message when the broker is no 
> longer running I get an exception. This enables me to test and recover on 
> the client side. But I am not sure what to do on the server side. 
> 
> The client side is easy because I can send a special message which I can 
> rig the server to ignore. But the server is just sitting on a consumer 
> receive and does not seem to get an exception when the broker goes away. 
> Unlike  the client I can't write a message. The server only writes replies 
> to requests and does so using a temporary Q. So I wonder what cn be 
> done....
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andrew Marlow

What version of ActiveMQ-CPP are you using?  I'd expect that if you are
using the 3.1 releases and haven't disabled the inactivity monitor that
the server would get an exception on its receive call when the
inactivity monitor times out the connection.

Regards
Tim.


> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
> Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H  for additional disclosures.