Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67041 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 May 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 77922 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77880 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77872 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 11:37:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:37:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.171] (HELO mail-gy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.160.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:37:54 +0000 Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so6330814gyf.2 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XiGAdhEPKtI3lvW62JgIVsrx+O4cuickHAJ3mHTefPo=; b=npurx9KfoKHqRlsauQ6RF+xRvqEbiMIKEejHwReXzK0Lk2oYX6G56JCp8IYs5UOaOt XmLrpWB/ByFgQ6XVbS6YwnxxAAizg+/zA2Qpu+EesSOpf/dD+ya1OA1E7lw0I9FtrW2a yc137wt9rj5Trb3O56FMNd/G0CHSeLzq/o2j8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MqLZ1di9bDoDpZBqvDH1Kmv/VzyPSWz76q6gA0MD/RlI71FufHj8p3Mz0D66QCp14Y 1s2dnCAHxem0z+bRheYkTAgkvNEL7tqYwuJKrFzeMqCM3TBn2aSVTmOtXiRDAa4mlWqL bbD+a7ZgLI22Qzuh4cpO34wlMlWpENxZ6piD0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.13.20 with SMTP id 20mr1396195ybm.170.1274355453593; Thu, 20 May 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.82.2 with HTTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28609396.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27827251.post@talk.nabble.com> <27839768.post@talk.nabble.com> <28605285.post@talk.nabble.com> <28609396.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:37:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Duplicate messages with a Durable Subscriber with networked brokers From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd7616421090f048705006d --000e0cd7616421090f048705006d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2720 is relevant. Would be good to get a test case that proves this is broken on trunk. Possibly the following test can provide inspiration: http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/ThreeBrokerVirtualTopicNetworkTest.java On 19 May 2010 15:53, rsmith198 wrote: > > Hi > I am not using a master slave configuration > it a peer-peer > Thanks > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Duplicate-messages-with-a-Durable-Subscriber-with-networked-brokers-tp27827251p28609396.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com --000e0cd7616421090f048705006d--